Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts

Friday, August 09, 2013

VHS-2 (2013)

[much better than the first part]

VHS-2 (2013)
IMDB- 6.4
Rottentomatoes- 69%
RJG Rating- 65

story- 5 Directors ,5 Horror Stories

Directors - Adam Wingard,Eduardo Sánchez&Gregg Hale,Gareth Evans,Jason Eisener,Simon Barrett

Acting overall is below average.All are newbies and first timers ,so nothing much can be expected of them.And plus ,being a horror movie ,all they need to do is scream and die.The worst of the lot ,was Phase1:Clinical Trials.Acting was just completely horrible.

VHS 1 was horrible,but managed to make enough profits to get a sequel.Even though i didnt expect anything from the sequel ,i was surprised at the quality.

Phase1:Clinical Trials-This one is about a guy who gets an eye fitted with a camera for an experiment.It had a good concept ,but thanks to the horrible acting and stupid gimmicks ,the story completely unwinds towards the end.The movie was directed and acted by Adam Wingard (VHS1).It had a slow start and an absurd end.
(story-1.5 ,direction- 2, horror- 3/5)

Ride In the Park -This one was about a cyclist who encounters Zombies.Concept wise it wasnt too clever and it seemed to be trying to get scares just through the gore aspect.The ending was vague and didnt make much sense, but somehow it did wrap up the story nicely.It wasnt scary and had a bit of a tiring repetitiveness to it ,initially.It was directed by Eduardo Sánchez and Gregg Hale (of The Blair Witch Project).
(story-2 ,direction- 2, horror-0/5, gore-3.5/5)

Safe Haven -Now this one was the BEST.This segment was about a group of reporters interviewing a cult leader.From start to finish it was exciting and the end was chilling.Made by Gareth Evans (director of the brilliant Raid Redemption) ,he nicely balanced the cheap aspect of the movie ,vagueness ,and delivered a story that was really horrifying.The camera settings were good and wasnt a hindrance.
(story-4.5 ,direction- 5 ,horror- 4/5, gore-4/5)

Slumber Party/Alien Abduction -This one is what the title is about...Slumber Party ,Alien Abduction.It was ok.The shaky cam was horrible ,and so was the cheap costumes.But it had the scare factor and concept wise was pretty ok.It was directed by Jason Eisener (director of Hobo With a Shotgun).It had bit of a slow start but thankfully it gets rolling quickly
(story-3.5 ,direction-3.5 ,horror- 3.5/5)

Tape 49-This is the main story ,which has 2 investigators ,checking an abandoned house full of tapes.The start was slow ,but it had a good punch at the end.Its directed by Simon Barrett (VHS1).It had a slow start but was much better than the main story of VHS1.The twist at the end was pretty solid too.
(story-3 ,direction- 3, horror- 3/5, gore-2/5)

Overall ,VHS2 is much better than its predecessor in terms of quality.It might not be the best horror movie you might have seen ,but its worth a watch if you are horror fans ,especially the segment Safe Haven.

Acting- 2/5
Story- rating given above
Direction- rating given above
Horror-rating given above
Gore- rating given above

VHS1-https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=526558104037785

Wednesday, June 06, 2012

Conan the Barbarian (2011)


[mindless action movie]

Conan the Barbarian (2011)
IMDB- 5.2
Rotten tomatoes- 23
RJG Rating- 30

Conan ,a barbarian ,seeks vengence against a mighty ruler.

Starring- Jason Momoa,Rachel Nichols,Stephen Lang,Rose McGowan
Director- Marcus Nispel

Conan is the reboot of the 1982 movie of the same name which starred Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Jason Momoa takes up the role of Conan.He is fit for the role ,all muscle & very less acting.The movie being a hack and slash movie theres not much need for any acting.Its all just glares and grunts and blood spurting out at the slightest touch.The supporting cast arent too great either.Rose McGowan's over acting is torturous.

Story is straight forward ,but its also filled with cliches of all kinds.Its highly predictable and any advances to bring a twist fails badly.The original story of Conan has its roots in magic ,monsters and so on.The movie spends most its time showing battles and sword fights ,but towards the end the writers seemed to have remembered that they forgot to add any magic or monsters.And so we have one or two scenes that involve Conan fighting monsters and sorcery,which uptill then didnt seem to exist.

Direction was very poor.The pace of the movie is slow and it rarely gets exciting.The running time of the movie seemed too long.And the overdose of fighting scenes can get boring towards the end.

Overall,this movie is strictly for action lovers but even they would find this boring.

Acting- 1.5/5
Story- 2/5
Direction- 1/5
Action- 3.5/5
Thriller- 2/5
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...